In this CNHL 6000mAh G+ LiPo test, I evaluated a high-capacity pack with a 70C rating to see how it performs under real-world conditions. I measured internal resistance, calculated the real C rating, and ran a 105A load test. I compared the results directly against the SMC HCL-EC pack.
What Makes It Unique
The CNHL 6000mAh G+ stands out for a few reasons:
- Higher capacity than typical 5200mAh packs
- Unique physical dimensions (wide and thin design)
- EC5 connector included
- Positioned as a relatively affordable high-capacity option
The size is the most notable difference, which may affect fitment depending on the RC platform.
Internal Resistance (IR)
The internal resistance test was performed using two packs.
- Average IR: ~1.41 mΩ per cell
Using my LiPo calculator:
- Calculated C rating: ~27.2C
- Max continuous current: ~163A
For comparison:
- SMC HCL-EC: ~1.60 mΩ → ~27.4C (~143A)
The CNHL shows slightly better IR, but the real advantage comes from its higher capacity, allowing greater total current delivery.
Load Test
I ran a 105A discharge test under identical conditions.
The results:
- Runtime: ~3 minutes before cutoff
- End temperature: Mid-50°C range (no overheating)
- Capacity delivered: 5312mAh (CNHL) vs 4977mAh (SMC)
- Energy delivered: 1113Wh (CNHL) vs 1036Wh (SMC)
- Average cell wattage: Slightly higher (~2%) on CNHL
- Voltage at 10 seconds: 3.71V (CNHL) vs 3.65V (SMC)
- Capacity to 3.50V: 1850mAh (CNHL) vs 1495mAh (SMC)
- Time to 3.50V: 63s (CNHL) vs 52s (SMC)
- Capacity to 3.60V: 852mAh (CNHL) vs 535mAh (SMC)
- Time to 3.60V: ~30s (CNHL) vs ~18s (SMC)
The CNHL delivered more capacity and stronger voltage retention, especially at higher voltage thresholds.
Practical Applications
For RC use, the CNHL 6000mAh G+ offers strong performance:
- Higher usable capacity under load
- Excellent voltage retention during high current draw
- Sustains 100A+ loads without overheating
- Strong performance in high-speed applications
In speed testing, this pack reached 149 km/h, outperforming the SMC HCL-EC in the same setup.
The main limitation is physical size, which may restrict compatibility in some builds.
Final Thoughts
The CNHL 6000mAh G+ LiPo test shows this pack delivers strong performance across all key metrics. It combines low internal resistance with higher capacity, resulting in excellent energy output and voltage stability under load.
While the SMC performs very well, the CNHL gains an edge through its higher capacity and improved high-voltage performance. The data shows consistent gains in capacity delivered, energy output, and runtime.
The only real drawback is its larger and less conventional size, which may not fit all RC platforms.
Overall, this is one of the better-performing packs tested, especially for users who can take advantage of the extra capacity.
Want the full data behind these battery tests? Join the RCexplained Battery Benchmark Squadron for access to detailed benchmark spreadsheets, internal resistance data, ranked battery comparisons, historical test data, plus the monthly RC Calculator spreadsheet and advanced data log analysis tools for Castle Creations ESCs used throughout this site. See membership options here.